skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Some people have the luxury of going to a grocery store and purchasing items because they like them. If they want to save some money, they may opt to purchase a generic brand of the item, but they still make the purchase. A person who lives in poverty faces very different “trade-offs” and often the choices are not easy ones to make. For example, a low-income individual may have to choose between filling a much needed prescription or paying the electric bill. It may be the choice of getting a meal or going hungry. Maybe they have a part-time job and need to pay for child care to work. The wage earned to work may not be much more than the cost for a child care provider.
Therefore, low-income families must decide what is most important at that very moment. It is not what they like or desire, but what their current greatest critical need is. If they don’t pay the electric bill then they won’t have heat and lights. If they are fortunate to have a job, how much will child care cost? What about transportation costs and if the only option is public transportation, is it available? If you add into the equation a sick child or other unpredictable expenses then the choices become even more precarious.
Many times we read about poor people being irresponsible. But I believe that, in many cases, it is not about responsibility but about priorities, and the priorities are driven by financial challenges which require complex decision-making. Choosing between your job, your health, your child’s health, food, medicine or electricity are pretty hard decisions. I recently met a lady that lost her job and home because two of her children became severely ill at the same time and she had no support system or safety net. She is currently living in a homeless facility in the upstate and trying to get back on her feet. Her circumstances left her with few choices and life as she knew it quickly cascaded out of control. There are thousands of people in the same boat.
As we think about the challenges we have in our own lives, it is important to put those challenges into perspective. Even though we often show empathy to those less fortunate, I am not sure we truly understand their plight. I will never forget the words of the lady in the upstate, “I live by faith and I want to be the best mother I can be, and work hard every day so I can provide for my children and live without depending on others for help.”
Difficult decisions and monumental consequences are a way of life for those living in poverty, day in and day out. Their hopes and aspirations may be no different than ours but their path to getting there is very different. Being mindful of the choices others have to make is part of the learning landscape. If we understand what it might be like to walk in someone else’s shoes, then I think we will be more apt to respect their circumstances a bit more.
Tom Keith is the president of the Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina
In philanthropy, as we look at our sphere of influence in society today it has a wide range of entry points. Foundations are called upon to make important and tactical decisions every day. These decisions often have influence on multiple people and organizations. A great many of these decisions are internal and are based on a program, process or an initiative or an intentional direction that a foundation is headed. Boards and staff decide on size and types of grants that are awarded, a process and decision around strategy, how much to invest in program evaluation, how much to invest in communications, etc.
The sphere of influence, referenced earlier, is changing for foundations and it should be. Philanthropy is a significant contributor to communities and to society as a whole and, therefore, has a major stake in how we effect community change. So do a lot of other entities such as government, business, schools, hospitals and various other organizations. If foundations are not looking for ways to influence thinking around issues that can impact their community, region and state, then they are missing an important dimension of their work and an opportunity to get to necessary change.
For example, if a decision is being made by a municipality that will move homeless people 10 miles out of town without adequate transportation and they become isolated, shouldn’t we speak up? It is our job to look at all the issues that affect society and, in particular, see how decisions are going to affect those indigent and low-income people. Alone, these members of society do not have the power or voice to influence the decision makers.
Furthermore, decision makers are often influenced by non objective outsiders that have a vested interest in the outcome of the decision, preventing this influence from being pure and unbiased. Foundations should be objective, and their resources and connections should position them to ask difficult questions and to demand “the little guy” gets his just due in the process.
Whether we are asking tough questions of government, business or other people of influence within our societal sphere, we must step forward and be willing to play a role. Philanthropy has a lot of responsibility and it wields a significant amount of power and influence. It is our responsibility to use that influence for the greater good and let our external opportunities be just as important as our internal decision making. Foundations can no longer live and work in isolation. What we do and what needs to be done reaches far beyond the walls of our office and local town or city. Now is the time for all foundations to step forward and advocate for their grantees, constituents and those in the greatest need. If we don’t aggressively move in this direction then shame on us when the outcome is not to our liking and negatively impacts our state. Tom Keith is the president of the Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina
